September 13, 2021
September 13, 2021

International Arbitration: U.S. Supreme Court Will Not Resolve Circuit Split Over Applicability of Section 1782 Discovery

By Jordyn Mitzman, Attorney At Law
By Jordyn Mitzman, Attorney At Law

U.S. discovery rules are generally more liberal and expansive than those in other countries. United States Statute 28 USC § 1782 provides a powerful tool for litigants engaged, or about to be engaged, in a foreign proceeding to utilize U.S. discovery rules to build and litigate their case.

Under Section 1782, federal district courts have the power to order individuals and entities located in the U.S. to provide “testimony or statement [including depositions] or to produce a document or other thing for use in a foreign or international tribunal.”

This statute allows foreign litigants to seek discovery of any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense.

Successful Section 1782 applicants may obtain discovery that they would not have otherwise received in the foreign forum as there is no requirement that the evidence is discoverable under the laws of the foreign court.

There is a split of authority among U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal over the statutory meaning of “foreign or international tribunal” and whether this includes private international arbitrations.

In March of this year, the Supreme Court agreed to resolve this ongoing debate and address whether Section 1782 authorizes district courts to order discovery for use in private international arbitration. This decision would have had a significant impact on private international arbitrations.

It was recently announced that this case will no longer be proceeding. It, therefore, remains uncertain whether parties to a private arbitration located outside of the U.S. can obtain discovery under Section 1782.

Whether engaged in litigation or arbitration, it is important to know and understand what tools are available for building, negotiating, or litigating your case.

Our team of multilingual attorneys across three continents are here to advise you on international arbitration and dispute resolution matters.

This article is authored by Jordyn Mitzman. Jordyn joined Pogust Goodhead in October of 2020 as an Associate Attorney at the firm’s Miami office and works primarily on the advancement and growth of the firm’s Section 1782 discovery practice.

More Opinions

Tom Goodhead: Fighting the rise of predatory extractivism
Tom Goodhead joined experts and victims of environmental crimes in Brazil at Harvard University to discuss extractive industries.
Read More
Navigating Medical Treatment for Gender Dysphoria in Young People: Insights from the Cass Review April 2024
The Final Cass Report was published in April 2024, over three and a half years later and two years after her Interim Report was published. The purpose...
Read More
The Law and Economics of climate and ESG legal risk management
While environmental and governance strategies are nothing new, the field of ESG legal risk management is growing exponentially.
Read More