On April 1, 2024 Pogust Goodhead filed an antitrust class action in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of individuals who purchased iPhones directly from Apple Inc. (“Apple”).
Apple’s Anticompetitive Conduct
The case alleges that Apple has engaged in anticompetitive conduct by erecting artificial barriers to keep users from purchasing competing devices.
The case alleges that Apple has maintained a smartphone monopoly by suppressing the following five key technologies that otherwise would have stimulated competition:
- Super Apps
- Cloud Streaming Game Apps
- Messaging Apps
- Smartwatches
- Digital Wallets
By suppressing technologies and innovation that would make it easier for consumers to switch device ecosystems (i.e. replace their iPhone with another manufacturer’s device), consumers have been faced with higher prices, lower quality. reduced innovation, reduced choices and lower quality output.
Plaintiff and the class allege that Apple’s actions constitute violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, prohibiting monopolization, or attempted monopolization, through anticompetitive means.
The case is JACQUELINE WATSON v. APPLE INC.
This comes on the heels of a highly-anticipated antitrust lawsuit filed on March 21, 2024 by the U.S. Department of Justice against Apple Inc., alleging that the tech giant monopolized smartphone markets through anticompetitive practices.
Pogust Goodhead’s competition and antitrust team has extensive experience representing victims of all types of anticompetitive conduct, from price fixing cartels to illegal monopolies.
If you have any questions or information related to tthe Apple antitrust case, please contact Jeffrey Gittleman or another member of the team below.
