Australian Federal Court Dismiss Volkswagen’s $95 Million Appeal In Dieselgate Scandal

April 20, 2021

The Australian federal court has dismissed Volkswagen’s appeal against their $95 million fine. The appeal was surrounding Volkswagen’s part in the Dieselgate emissions scandal.

Case history 

An appeal was submitted by Volkswagen after a judgment in December 2019. The Australian federal court found that they had breached consumer laws by falsifying emissions levels 

It was concluded that Volkswagen did not disclose the existence of two-mode’ software when it sought approval to supply and import tens of thousands of vehicles into Australia between 2011 and 2015. 

‘Two-mode’ software enables the vehicle to be put into test mode to cheat emissions testing. In real world driving conditions, the emissions would be much higher. This same system has brought several other manufacturers into the spotlight for their part in the Dieselgate scandal.  

Volkswagen was asked to pay for its part in misleading the government and drivers but, soon after the 2019 decision, appealed. 

Appeal terms 

After being ordered to pay a record $95 million, VW asked for the fine to be reduced to approximately $58 million. This is the amount the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) had previously suggested Volkswagen should be fined. 

In a statement to Reuters, Volkswagen said they thought a fine of  $58 million was ‘fair’ and would review the decision to consider their options.  

Last week, their appeal was denied, and Volkswagen will now have to pay the full $95 million.  

Dieselgate and My Diesel Claim 

The Australian case ione of a number of ongoing cases around the globe, after it was alleged several car manufacturers fitted defeat devices in hundreds of thousands of vehicles to cheat emissions testing.  

We are litigating against a number of the manufacturers alleged to be involved in the Dieselgate scandal. We are aiming to help drivers claim back up to £10,000 In the USA, billions of dollars have already been paid out in settlement agreements. 

To find out more, and to join the claim, head to MyDieselClaim.com.

More Press

The-Royal-Courts-of-Justice_AdobeStock_87658912_830x415-480x240-c-default
Pogust Goodhead Defeats BHP Bid To Block Deposition Of Former Renova Chief 
LONDON, UK – The High Court has rejected mining giant BHP’s application for an anti-suit injunction (ASI) that sought to prevent Pogust Goodhead...
Read More
Profile photo of Jonathan Wheeler
Pogust Goodhead appoints Jonathan Edward Wheeler as Partner and Head of Mariana Litigation 
Pogust Goodhead law firm has appointed Jonathan Edward Wheeler as a partner and Head of Mariana Litigation, adding heavyweight firepower to the team driving one of...
Read More
04 - Chief Baiara, from the Pataxó Indigenous Community, during a protest in London
‘A Victory for Justice’ as High Court rules BHP liable for dam disaster in landmark case
Historical ruling holds the mining giant liable for the Mariana dam disaster under Brazilian environmental law and the Brazilian Civil Code. The Court...
Read More